Tuesday, June 04, 2013

Of Course School "Reform" is a Load of B.S.

It is another attempt by the neoliberal gangsters to pilper the public treasury for profit. They couldn't care less about education or children.

And the "reforms" have nothing to do with dealing with poverty.

One way to appreciate this reality in stark relief is to just remember that, as Barkan shows, for all the claims that the traditional public school system is flawed, America’s wealthiest traditional public schools happen to be among the world’s highest-achieving schools. Most of those high-performing wealthy public schools also happen to be unionized. If, as “reformers” suggest, the public school system or the presence of organized labor was really the key factor in harming American education, then those wealthy schools would be in serious crisis — and wouldn’t be at the top of the international charts. Instead, the fact that they aren’t in crisis and are so high-achieving suggests neither the system itself nor unions are the big factor causing high-poverty schools to lag behind. It suggests that the “high poverty” part is the problem.

That, of course, shouldn’t be a controversial notion; it is so painfully obvious it’s amazing anyone would even try to deny it. But that gets back to motive: The “reform” movement (and its loyal media outlets) cast a discussion of poverty as taboo because poverty and inequality are byproducts of the same economic policies that serve that movement’s funders.

Sirota needs to realize that the "reformers" will go after rich public schools and public school districts because this "reform" movement has nothing to do with education or poverty.

It is a bank heist, period.

No comments: